APPRAISING THE SECRETARIES AT SWEETWATER U CASE STUDY ANSWERS

During an appraisal, the employee is evaluated on job performances and is thought to improve job performance and show any areas that are in need for improvement. The distribution of the budget for appraisal should be fair to keep the staff satisfied. Therefore the administrator who is rating might not be happy with the work done by the secretary but the secretary might think that it was the best work done by him. Choose a favorite tutor or get automatically matched with our recommendation. The main objective of a performance appraisal system is to develop good performance from the employees and to raise production.

These are the countries currently available for verification, with more to come! When applying for a tutor account, you will be automatically signed out of your student account. What performance appraisal system would you develop for the secretaries if you were Rob Winchester? This is the book: California Institute of Technology Tutors.

Homework Help from Verified Tutors

This will not improve ability and skills of secretaries and clerks. The 5 Love Languages by Gary Chapman. Because in this system employees are ranked from best to worst on a particular trait. Oxford University Tutors. The recommendations given by the experts were good and made sense but these recommendations created problems like efficacy of any graphic rating forms if it is compared to the original forced ranking approach used by Rob and what should be the basis of performance appraisal.

These goals should be achievable goals as well as the goals being adjusted to meet the needs of individual employees so that there is a better chance of the employee achieving their goals. I need help with this payroll project from Chapter 7. I was wondering what the lowest carat of gold shoul Click here to sign up. But forced ranking system is very strict and it is unfair for those who have a very good staff.

  THE QUALITATIVE DOCTORAL DISSERTATION PROPOSAL BRENT KILBOURN

SOLUTION: Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U – Studypool

Therefore the administrator who appraisinb rating might not be teh with the work done by the secretary but the secretary might think that it was the best work done by him.

Explain your answers in words. The administrators might be biased and convinced to rate “excellent”. Do you think that Vice President Winchester would be better off dropping graphic rating forms, substituting instead one of the other technique we discussed in this chapter, such as a ranking method?

appraising the secretaries at sweetwater u case study answers

Instead, the ranking method is much better to get the desired result. Taking It Downtown” by Br With this thing one more problem came up with the system was that it was letting even the incompetent secretaries to enjoy the benefits like increments in the salaries. There should provide performance appraisal software so that the administrator can only put the data and the authority can only find the ultimate total score and can easily evaluate.

Staff satisfaction is a big criterion for any organization to work. I’m still living at home, so for me there are almost no living expenses to worry a The managers would be pleased with the recommendation to rescind Mr.

  MONGODB M101P HOMEWORK 2.3

This idea might be good when the appraisal system is not efficient.

According to research by R. Answer the questions to the case, “Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U,” at the end of Chapter 6. Alternation ranking method avoids central tendency. This subsequently led to the decrease in the overall quality of the work.

Need help with some Discussions about cultural issues that may impact on you as an ICT professional. The bottom line is that the appraisal often says more about the appraiser than about the appraisee. A Few administrators swretwater to be unpopular to his subordinates and he will hesitate to rate the optimum marks.

Appraising the Secretaries at Sweetwater U. For example, one study found that raters penalized successful women for their success.

appraising the secretaries at sweetwater u case study answers

This new forced ranking system was done because administrators were very lenient in ranking their staff. Remember me on this computer. Answer Yes, because using graphic rating forms have several problems such as unclear standards, halo effect, central tendency, leniency, bias etc. The initial performance appraisal form was filled by administrators.

Author: admin