The Gravity Research Foundation essay competition, for example, has offered prizes for essays on gravitational physics since , and many of the winning essays, several of which were authored by Perimeter faculty or Distinguished Visiting Research Chairs, are now considered classics. Indeed, relativistic filters are all what technical systems can do anyway: However, just removing the institutional filter on the ability to put things on the web in fact there is no such filter as any serious person can easily make their own web site as I did, with the only problem of how to be referenced , or on who can write reviews, cannot be the magical solution against any real or assumed “bias” problem. There is a venerable history of major open questions in theoretical physics being tackled by essay contests, and they have helped to advance the field in ways that complement the traditional peer-review system and journal publication. Namely, tangent vectors x,y,z,t to this point are identified with Hermitian forms on E with matrix. Mathematical Universe Hypothesis mathematical monism QM: Maudlin as expressed elsewhere.

However, just removing the institutional filter on the ability to put things on the web in fact there is no such filter as any serious person can easily make their own web site as I did, with the only problem of how to be referenced , or on who can write reviews, cannot be the magical solution against any real or assumed “bias” problem. But it’s not even that he tries to defend any obscurantist ideology there: Mind makes collapse after decoherence This contest: Scientism Platonism Recognize with R. To explain how the concepts of “abstraction” and “generality” differ, I need to take a specific example. As for the remarkable role of maths in physics:

Everyone his own opinion. But the essay of Philip Gibbs does not have this “quality”.

I would like you to consider the case of the Dirac equation. As for the remarkable role of maths in physics: He does not even try to defend any obscurantist position that would please the idiots; as his position mathematical universe hypothesis belongs to the scientism group. Klingman calls himself “physicalist” here but expressed spiritualism in another essay. But where does the problem come from?

## About the FQXI essay contest on the math/physics connection

This equation describes the field of electronic presence as taking values in the space of bispinors of space-time. In fact, the popularity he gets among idiots by his creation of ViXra and his ideas on Esday Peer Review, is based on a double misunderstanding: What matters is the opportunity for sane people, able to define the right standards, to get information filtered according to their own standard.

Because to be high rated by idiots, it does not suffice for essays to be stupid nonsense. The content of a theory is usually specified by describing separately the physical states essay are possible in the theory, known as its kinematics, and the rules that govern how one state evolves into another, or its dynamics. Mind makes collapse before decoherence H.

Local deterministic realism FQXI essays some are included here just based on the authors positively commenting crackpot ones: Idiots give ocntest high rates, not that they love his essay, but because they love him. Many-worlds interpretation Famous physicists: Removing the institutional filter, suspected of bias, cannot suffice to remove bias, as the rest of the world outside institutions can still be biased and even worse than the one in institutions. On the contrary, scientific quality would be rather a handicap in this rating.

For more conest, see: Concretely, a big problem with a spinor is that its phase is reversed when you apply to it a rotation with angle 2pi. His proposition of open peer review, where anyone can bring a review, can be nice, as, for example, my ideas how to better explain maths and physics do not find place in the institutions just because it is not in the usual official jobs of researchers to consider such things as changes in the curriculum, so I would need to find “peers” elsewhere.

Because average humans who “care” often have a big contesg for obscurantism i. Of course some essays have well-deserved very low rating.

They also need to be the sort of sophisticated, “quality” nonsense able to give idiots the feeling that it constitutes an intelligent, convincing defense of their obscurantist ideology. The independent Institute was founded in to foster breakthroughs in the fundamental understanding of our universe, from the smallest particles to the entire cosmos.

# Robert Spekkens wins first prize in FQXi essay contest | Perimeter Institute

To explain how the concepts of “abstraction” and “generality” differ, I need to take a specific example. To read all of the winning entries, visit http: However, he does not seem to realize the difficulty of the task, and how it can fail if it is done in a naive manner.

However, just removing the institutional filter on the ability to put things on the web in fact there is no such filter as any serious person can easily make their own web site as I did, with the only problem of how to be referencedor on who can write reviews, cannot be the magical solution against any real or assumed “bias” problem.

Cqxi people usually hate mathematics because they cannot understand it, so they need pseudo-arguments to feel proud of their ignorance. Then is also a clash between the cells of the Obscurantism column. Despite of this, and that I rated 10 the cotest 2 above, we still have very bad ratings: This remarkable character of the success of mathematics in physics really means something non-necessary, and really remarkableas expressed in several essays: Obscurantism Anti-Platonism Deny the amazing efficiency of mathematics observed in physics; stay ignorant about it.

Mind makes collapse after decoherence Fwxi contest: The FQXi contesh competition entries are available ckntest public viewing and feedback, resulting in lively online discussions between essay contributors and other members of the community.