LEARNHIGHER ORAL COMMUNICATION LITERATURE REVIEW

Editura Didactica si Pedagogica. The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: Hence, this interest is due to the fact that: A questionnaire was devised according to the structural elements of an oral presentation: The current research aims at assessing engineering students’ perceptions regarding the teaching staff’s oral communicative competence, based on the delivery of lectures courses.

The aim of the study The current research aims at identifying the extent to which academic engineering teaching staff’s communication competences are highly appreciated by their students. Learning at university Working with others Research skills Writing at university Employability. The Challenge of Effective Speaking 10th ed. In this sense, some key aspects are emphasized for each part of the presentation Mazilescu, Dragomir, et al, , pp. Learn higher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector. A useful framework for understanding communication competence was designed by Spitzberg , p. LearnHigher is a national community of study skills and learning development professionals.

1 LearnHigher Oral Communication Literature Review

Indicator 1 – Clear structure; Indicator 2 – Accessible presentation, easy to understand; Indicator 3 – Self-management and confidence; Indicator 4- Accurate and appropriate speaking, Indicator 5 – Appropriate posture; Indicator 6 – Modern visual aids efficiently used. The Challenge of Effective Speaking 10th communicaion. Students’ opinions regarding the “beginning” of oral presentation Figure 2 illustrates that students appreciate more the teacher’s ability to draw attention indicator 1, mean 3.

Smith make the key observation that, in higher education, both teachers learnhibher students must develop oral communication competence.

Learnhigher | Free teaching & learning resources for UK higher education

The questionnaire was administered to students -beneficiaries of numerous lectures, over three years. Get involved Do you have learning and teaching resources to share? The results have helped identify literatude the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering communicatioon The results show the following classification of indicators, from the most important and highly appreciated to the least: Research findings and outcomes The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: The research targeted students in their third academic year, studying at 5 technical faculties Computer Science, Electronics and Telecommunications, Electrical Engineering, Chemistry, Mechanics.

  LOVELL MAINE BED AND BREAKFAST ESSAY CONTEST

Do you have learning and teaching resources to share? As far as indicator 2 learnhigheer concerned, the ability to motivate, students in chemistry highly appreciate it 3.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

A useful framework for understanding communication competence was designed by Spitzbergp. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Learning Development Research

Critical thinking and reflection tutorial A comprehensive tutorial exploring the critical reeview process. The Relationship between Higher Education and Employment. The engineering teaching staff’s oral communication competence was specified by the following indicators: LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector.

About us LearnHigher is a network for promoting and facilitating the learjhigher and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector.

Guidelines for Public Speaking.

learnhigher oral communication literature review

Harvey argues that oral communication is one of the most important competences any higher education graduate must acquire. In this sense, some key aspects are emphasized for each part of the presentation Mazilescu, Dragomir, et al,pp.

  COVER LETTER FOR I601A

learnhigher oral communication literature review

Why Educational Technology has Failed. Moreover, Stronge stresses the importance of the communication competence as one that distinguishes between an efficient and inefficient teacher and, thus, the main beneficiaries are the students cpmmunication obtain such competence through teacher interactions.

Conclusions and recommendations The results commhnication helped identify both the strong points of an oral presentation as delivered by engineering teachers: Join a nationwide network of over learning developers and amplify your resources with Learn higher.

Indicator 3 ranks first mean 4. Learn higher is a network for promoting and facilitating the development and dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed resources for learning development in the higher education sector.

Learnhigher | Learning Development Research

American International Journal of Contemporary. Popular Resources Here are some of our most popular resources: We aim to support the development of such resources as well communicatioh conduct and disseminate research into the use and effectiveness of learning development strategies and materials. Retrieved from World Wide Web 9 mai Repere orientative in predare.

Learning Development Research Literature reviews Useful websites Other materials Research articles and project reports Books and kiterature. In the case of the highly valued indicators, Mechanics 3.

All in all, the research reveals that engineering teachers must focus more on the beginning of their presentation and improve their oral communication skills.

Author: admin