OKEFENOKEE SWAMP AP LANG ESSAY

Click to learn more https: In order to emphasize how nasty these creatures are he mentions how they sting, bite, and bore into humans, making a visit there undesirable. The figurative language the author uses in the second passage is primarily focused on repelling the reader and persuading them not to come to the swamp and stay in the comforts of their own home. Detail is a major factor throughout the two passages that helps distinguish the swamps in the passages from one another. Sorry, but copying text is not allowed on this site. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. In the first passage the swamp is seen as something that holds beauty and is inviting unlike in the second passage where the swamp seems more malicious and repelling.

The author holds two very different tones when discussing the different swamps. In the first passage, the Okefenokee Swamp is described with a wide variety of diction. If you contact us after hours, we’ll get back to you in 24 hours or less. In contrast the second passage clearly includes all the dangerous details of Okefenokee swamp. Sorry, but copying text is not allowed on this site. We’ll occasionally send you account related and promo emails. The author uses different devices throughout the passages to create and convey a certain tone for each swamp.

You are commenting using your Google account.

Okefenokee Swamp Passage Ap-Lang 11th grade Essay Example | Graduateway

How to cite this page Choose cite format: Your Answer is very helpful for Us Thank okefenojee a lot! In the first passage the author uses personification to expand and emphasize the beauty of the swamp.

  HESI CASE STUDY HYPERTENSION ANSWERS

okefenokee swamp ap lang essay

To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Employing imagery, diction, and syntax, this swamp is delineated by two writers. ScienceCreative writing. We will write a custom sample essay on Okefenokee Swamp specifically for you. Many of the of the compelling and exotic details used by the first author were blatantly left out by the second. It is notable that the writer shies away from writing in detail about dangerous species, keeping their sssay about alligators at the end okeefnokee short.

The fact that the imagery portrays the Swamp negatively reveals his view on how the swamp is disgusting and an abominable place. How about make it original?

Okefenokee Swamp Ap Lang Essay

Sorry, but downloading is forbidden on this website. You are commenting using your WordPress.

Each passage describes the area with a different purpose and a different view. Sorry, but copying text is not allowed on this site.

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Okefenokee Swamp send By clicking “Send”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. Such sentences are lengthy unlike the first passage, where appealing sentences were lengthy. The first describes the swamp in an admiring manner, portraying it as a surreal tropical paradise.

The passage swmp the Encyclopedia Britannica only consists of unbiased information, therefore it has an objective tone.

okefenokee swamp ap lang essay

While the first passage induces a sense of appreciation, the second writer, also using syntax, imagery, and dictioncreates a frightful place of terror. Unlike in the first passage where the figurate language was solely focused on inviting the reader to visit the swamp and enjoy the beauty and serenity the swamp had to offer.

Although he provides information about the swamp, Boyle adds his own opinion making the entire passage subjective. The author uses different devices throughout the passages to create and convey a certain tone for each swamp. Just like the author did in passage one, Boyle mentions the wildlife of Okefenokee Swamp, yet he is very precise about which species he talks about: In the first passage the swamp is seen as something that holds beauty and is inviting unlike in the second passage where the swamp seems more malicious and repelling.

  ZELLNER THESIS AWARD

The writer uses descriptive words that portray neither positive nor negative connotations. The author uses various literary devices throughout the two passages to show that he appreciates one swamp more than the other.

You are commenting using your Facebook account. The first passage is unbiased, as the author presents Okefenokee Swamp with straightforward information. In this part of the passage, Boyle focuses solely on insects, which are repulsive to most humans.

Okefenokee Swamp Ap Lang Essay

In comparison, the sentences that describe the visual details of moss, water, and flowers are long and cumulative. In order to emphasize how nasty these creatures are he mentions how they sting, bite, and bore into humans, making a visit there undesirable.

okefenokee swamp ap lang essay

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website.

Author: admin