Thirteen studies were included in our updated review. Related More from user. How effective are routine dental checks of different recall frequencies in improving quality of life, reducing the morbidity associated with dental caries, periodontal disease and oral cancer , and reducing the mortality associated with oral cancer in adults? As part of my presentation on using technology in dental hygiene education, the host of the conference asked if I could provide a hands-on mini-project for the 26 attendees. Cohort simulations Markov models were constructed to estimate for each recall interval:.
In the sections that follow, the results of the HTA Report are first summarised narratively, the results of the updated review are then presented and a brief commentary is added as to whether the latter results have any impact on the conclusions of the former. If you have any troubles with writing a research proposal, we are here to help you. For each risk group, the outcome of the model was cost per tooth free from decay, fillings or extraction at the end of the model simulation. The updated review only found studies concerning permanent teeth, consequently, the results are compared with the HTA Report results for permanent teeth only. Or use it to upload your own PowerPoint slides so you can share them with your teachers, class, students, bosses, employees, customers, potential investors or the world.
The total cost of OHRs and the cost associated with the treatment of decay filling deciduous and permanent dentition per patient.
ePortfolio: Kelli R: Patient Care: RCampus
One case-control study, comparing regular attenders with casual attenders, reported a significant increase in the proportion of subjects with visual caries causing cavitation with a decrease peruodontal dental check frequency Bullock et al. The studies had relatively short periods of observation from 2 years to 10 years and variable sample size from 46 to It includes brief, but.
Our writing service provides custom papers written from scratch in Five studies reported no significant difference between DMFT and frequency of dental attendance. Considering these results in the context of the periodontla results of the HTA review does not alter the principal finding of the latter, namely that the results of studies investigating the relationship between dental check frequency and measures of periodontal disease in permanent dentition provide conflicting results.
The effects of dental check frequency were examined in a diverse range of age groups.
Dental Case Studies PowerPoint PPT – powershowcom
The quality assessment of all studies focused on prriodontal potential sources of bias, specifically selection bias, performance bias, attrition bias and measurement bias. Overall, there was no consistency observed across studies in the direction of effect of different dental caes frequencies on measures of caries and periodontal disease.
This would not capture all of the health gain attributable to the OHR. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: One study reported a significant association between dental check frequency and decay but the direction of the relationship was not given.
Tutorial to the research paper outline. S original research on a. The majority of studies reported outcomes in terms of mean changes in measures.
Periodontal Case Study – PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The other three studies suggested that extending recall intervals could save some resources through reduction in dentist ‘s time but may have an adverse effect on the level of dental health measured in terms of DMFS Lunder ; Wang et al.
Patients were not only happy and more confident with the physical appearance of their teeth, but they no longer suffered from jaw stress, tension headaches, sleeping issues and postural pain. Hence, it can’t be concluded which interval is optimal in terms of cost-effectiveness. What follows is a hypothetical example of a research paper based on an experiment. One of these studies Bullock et al.
Get the plugin now. However, not all model parameters were tested in the sensitivity analysis — the biggest omission being the clinical effectiveness of dental check-ups, an assumption that was not made explicit in the report. Cohort simulations Markov models were constructed to estimate for each recall interval:.
Patients with mixed-dentition and edentate patients were also omitted. The outline of the paper should be produced before researching and writing because it will serve as the basis around which you. Outcomes The 13 studies reported a diversity of clinical status outcomes for dental caries, periodontal disease and oral cancerincluding: Or use it to find and download high-quality how-to PowerPoint ppt presentations with illustrated or animated slides that will teach you how to do pediodontal new, also for free.
Different risk factors other than social class and water fluoridation were not taken into account. It helps you through the steps of writing a research paper.