Scoring is based upon a broad variety of norm groups: Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15, — The latest, the WGCTAs, was revised in and is a short form containing 40 items that can be administered in 45 min. Evaluating critical thinking skills in a scenario-based community health course. Given the high variability around the correlation means, we judged the resolution of this research question to be inconclu- sive, although suggestive of the medium average correlations that would be expected if the subscales were inter- correlated.

Rust, Jones, and Kaiser provided a rationale for PCA on subscale means in lieu of items-level data. The reverse would be expected to be true if the average inter-correlation among the 13 studies of the WGCTA were significantly less that expected by chance. Log In Sign Up. Statistical analysis of three critical thinking tests. Discussion This project attempts to answer two interrelated research questions about the psychometric properties of the WGCTA, using independent data sets derived from the empirical literature. Statistics Solutions consists of a team of professional methodologists and statisticians that can assist the student or professional researcher in administering the survey instrument, collecting the data, conducting the analyses and explaining the results.

We first calculated the homogeneity statistic QT for each individual correlation coefficient watsonglaser identified one study as an outlier across all subscales i. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, This is further and more convincing evidence that over many samples of different learner groups, that no clear subscale structure is discernable.


The Watson-Glaser™ II | PSI Online

A factor analytic study of three critical thinking tests, one English test, and one logical reasoning test. Statistical analysis of three critical thinking tests. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25 4— The evidence we have examined to date suggests the former view is more likely. We found cditical limited amount crjtical demographic data that was common across studies.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4 3— The result of this analysis should shed some light on how highly inter-correlated the subscales are and whether the variability around the mean correlation exceeds the expectations of chance fluctuation.

Does college make a difference? They appraksal state that: Critical thinking, intelligence, and vocabulary. Psychological Reports, 23, — Subsequently, we conducted principal components analysis on 60 subscale means of two different versions of the WGCTA.

Interpreting the CCST, group norms and sub-scores technical report 4. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. By Debra Creedy and Mary Sidebotham.

watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal (wgcta) - form b

We found using 60 complete sets of subscale means, drawn from the literature, the one-component solution emerged for both forms of the WGCTA. An experimental study comparing critical thinking growth and learning styles in a traditional and workshop based introductory mathematics course. Journal of Research in Science Training, 25, — Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 6— It was constructed around five appraisak or CT skills: The test administrator will take necessary steps to ensure the Test is always administered in a proctored and secure environment.


Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA)

The effect of instruction in general semantics on the critical thinking of tenth and eleventh grade students, Ed. While we are unable to speak definitively on matters of test construction and the reliability problem, the implications of our findings for research on CT and practical use watsoh-glaser the WGCTA are important.

Effects of an instructional program on critical thinking and clinical decision-making skills of associate degree nursing students nursing education. Women are more predictable than men.

watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal (wgcta) - form b

Factor analysis of achievement, scholastic aptitude, and critical thinking subtests. Number of items correct and performance on each scale are reported in addition to an overall percentile and a brief narrative interpretation.

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) – Statistics Solutions

The development of critical thinking: Although we looked, we were unable to locate any inter-item correlation matrices in the published literature. The Journal of Higher Education, 73 3— Educational and Psychological Measurement, 27, — One scale or many subscales? What they likely do say is that discriminating among these sub-skills, from a psychometric perspective, is difficult to do.

Author: admin